View previous topic :: View next topic |
this vote will decide about the future of this invention: |
this can be added to the game |
|
83% |
[ 5 ] |
it needs some changes but it is a good invention |
|
16% |
[ 1 ] |
i will post the needed changes here |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
no good try another one |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
Total Votes : 6 |
|
Author |
Message |
tec_server Technology Bot
Joined: 04 Nov 2002 Posts: 1746
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: newshound |
|
|
newshound (class 4 ship)
this is an improvement of the news-ship it has the same abillities as the news-ship plus it has the trace probe-, dsp- and oscillationprobe-ability´s
attack/life: 0/1000
manpower: 250
speed: warp 500
(can only establish a warpfield for itself)
it has a cloaking device
researchtime: 1 d
buildingtime: 12 h
needed research:
improved field theories
battle details:
fights
(battle engine syntax: f) |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Ratchet 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 178 Location: @ home
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 3:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voila i made the improved Newsship and i gave T2 his pleasure so i named it Newshound _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Jort Admiral
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 1264 Location: Amsterdam
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah maybe GNN can make a few, so they have live reporters from everywhere |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Armedes Vice Admiral
Joined: 10 Oct 2005 Posts: 412
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that's the whole point of the ship _________________ The spartans do not ask how many....
but where! |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Ratchet 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 178 Location: @ home
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
they can at least build 19 ships or even 20
should that be enough _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Mighty Admiral
Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Posts: 738
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nice ship to go against a doomstar if you ask me _________________
AKA "Ace" (21 Apr 2008)
AKA "God" (29 Sep 2002)
AKA "SMod" (25 oct 2002)
Permanently inactive since - 20 Mar 2009 |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mighty wrote: | nice ship to go against a doomstar if you ask me |
I'd like 1 nano virus in an empty fleet at base coords or a flying saucer even more |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Ratchet 2nd Rear Admiral
Joined: 26 Nov 2005 Posts: 178 Location: @ home
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mighty wrote: | nice ship to go against a doomstar if you ask me | The ship can't fight only reoprt the fights _________________
|
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Posts: 1422
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you crazy people?
1-GNN was born by it self
2- The admin didnt created, it was invented by the ST players i think.
3-If someone gets this ship we will know who si the reporter
4-As the GNN isnt oficial(having a special forum dont becoem this to an oficial feature of ST) this ship is too powerfull
5- A player can use this for personal motive
6-It could also work to spy.
Etc etc. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
T2 Admiral
Joined: 26 Mar 2005 Posts: 1398 Location: Ontario
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rubens wrote: | Are you crazy people?
1-GNN was born by it self
2- The admin didnt created, it was invented by the ST players i think.
3-If someone gets this ship we will know who si the reporter
4-As the GNN isnt oficial(having a special forum dont becoem this to an oficial feature of ST) this ship is too powerfull
5- A player can use this for personal motive
6-It could also work to spy.
Etc etc. |
I would think this ship is only available if you log in as GNN. As that name is taken, nobody else would be able to use this ship.
I also think Admin must be involved or GNN would not get a header line in the front page of the game.
GNN should not be a fighting account...only this ship available to them.
At the rate new ships are placed into the game, we could expect to see it sometime next year or the year after.
Regardless Rubans, your fears are valid and thanks for expressing them. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
WilliamWallace Admiral
Joined: 02 May 2005 Posts: 893
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2006 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it plain sucks.
GNN is from some player, who knows who. The whole beauty of the concept of GNN was WE make the news. The players decide what is given to them
Too bad hardly any people gave news, but hey that is a whole different matter. |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
Rubens Admiral
Joined: 20 Apr 2003 Posts: 1422
|
Posted: Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
William is right T2
I dont doubt about your knowledge, but for you and everyone that joins we should explain what is the GNN, i will do it now in a shor way.
GNN appear at the forum without signals. They just posted somethings in an anonymus way.
The admin. THAT KNOWS THE GAME IS DIEING, saw this, and try to use it to attract people from the begining so they got that line in the principal page and a special forum for them. But the admin has never been involved with the writers of the articles. Now, everybody has a battle, someone has the time to make an history, but if you make it you have to be responsable of that and you can say a bit too much about you or someone else, that's why nobody writes an article;)
This ship would be given to a player, an unknown player, so this player can be an spy etc. It's really dificult that the ship wouldnt be used in a bad way;)
Greetings, Rubens |
|
Back to top » |
|
|
|